lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161219102402.GA24893@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:24:02 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Sami Kerola <kerolasa@....fi>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: return EOPNOTSUPP when ioctl_fsthaw() is not
 supported

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 06:57:27PM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote:
> An attempt to freeze a filesystem that does not support such operation is
> reported as EOPNOTSUPP to user.  Running unfreeze to the same filesystem
> returns EINVAL.  Later is a little misleading, users can mix that message
> with return value from unfreezing when filesystem is not frozen.

This is going to break gfs2 with it's odd ->that_super method.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ