linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt: fix incorrect comparison operator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161219234529.GA2970@portege.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:45:29 +0300
From:   Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt: fix incorrect
 comparison operator

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 04:13:13PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 23:53:40 +0200
> Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > In the actual implementation ether_addr_equal function tests for equality to 0
> > when returning. It seems in commit 0d74c4 it is somehow overlooked to change
> > this operator to reflect the actual function.

I realized that I generated the patch with the -k flag to git
format-patch. And think that it'd be better to resend it without this
flag. Besides that nothing is changed in the patch itself. Sorry for
the noise.

> 
> I received this patch two days ago; has something changed that you're
> sending it again?
> 
> Meanwhile, there was a question from Ozgur Karatas on the patch, but I've
> not yet seen your response.

Ok, I'll try to answer his question.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon

Cihangir