[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wpeuu9qm.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:21:21 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, driver-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: Fix kernel oops introduced with commit e49656147359
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> writes:
> With commit e49656147359 {"rtlwifi: Use dev_kfree_skb_irq instead of
> kfree_skb"), the method used to free an skb was changed because the
> kfree_skb() was inside a spinlock. What was forgotten is that kfree_skb()
> guards against a NULL value for the argument. Routine dev_kfree_skb_irq()
> does not, and a test is needed to prevent kernel panics.
>
> Fixes: commit e49656147359 {"rtlwifi: Use dev_kfree_skb_irq instead of kfree_skb")
This should be:
Fixes: e49656147359 ("rtlwifi: Use dev_kfree_skb_irq instead of kfree_skb")
> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
> Cc: Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> (4.9+)
And this:
Cc: Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.9+
I can fix both of them.
> Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> ---
> Kalle,
>
> This change should be sent to mainline during the 4.10 merge period,
> or as soon as possible.
Ok, I'll queue this to 4.10. Most likely I'll send a pull request to
Dave later this week or so.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists