linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: add depends, COMPILE_TEST and default y for brcm-iproc-pwm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:32:21 -0800
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: add depends, COMPILE_TEST and default y for
 brcm-iproc-pwm

Hi Thierry,

Could you pick up this patch?

On 16-10-08 02:02 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/8/2016 1:54 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
>> - Add depends on COMMON_CLK for PWM_BCM_IPROC
>> - Enable COMPILE_TEST for broader compile coverage.
>> - Default y for IPROC PWM driver for IPROC SoCs.
>> This allows you to turn it on simply by selecting CONFIG_PWM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>> index 80a566a..3eb1b6b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>> @@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ config PWM_ATMEL_TCB
>>
>>  config PWM_BCM_IPROC
>>      tristate "iProc PWM support"
>> -    depends on ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>> +    depends on ARCH_BCM_IPROC || COMPILE_TEST
>> +    depends on COMMON_CLK
>> +    default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>      help
>>        Generic PWM framework driver for Broadcom iProc PWM block. This
>>        block is used in Broadcom iProc SoC's.
>>
>
> Looks good to me!
>
> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>