[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g3sgQ=Lh99RP7V5g-okgdC=BaeW8oLtHRfwU1gmh07=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:53:46 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Yumei Huang <yuhuang@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Xiaof Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
mtosatti@...hat.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: DAX mapping detection (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix region lost in /proc/self/smaps)
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Darrick J. Wong
<darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 05:18:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Darrick J. Wong
>> <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 02:11:49PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:54:05PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> >> <>
>> >> > Definitely the first step would be your simple preallocated per
>> >> > inode approach until it is shown to be insufficient.
>> >>
>> >> Reviving this thread a few months later...
>> >>
>> >> Dave, we're interested in taking a serious look at what it would take to get
>> >> PMEM_IMMUTABLE working. Do you still hold the opinion that this is (or could
>> >> become, with some amount of work) a workable solution?
>> >>
>> >> We're happy to do the grunt work for this feature, but we will probably need
>> >> guidance from someone with more XFS experience. With you out on extended leave
>> >> the first half of 2017, who would be the best person to ask for this guidance?
>> >> Darrick?
>> >
>> > Yes, probably. :)
>> >
>> > I think where we left off with this (on the XFS side) is some sort of
>> > fallocate mode that would allocate blocks, zero them, and then set the
>> > DAX and PMEM_IMMUTABLE on-disk inode flags. After that, you'd mmap the
>> > file and thereby gain the ability to control write persistents behavior
>> > without having to worry about fs metadata updates. As an added plus, I
>> > think zeroing the pmem also clears media errors, or something like that.
>> >
>> > <shrug> Is that a reasonable starting point? My memory is a little foggy.
>> >
>> > Hmm, I see Dan just posted something about blockdev fallocate. I'll go
>> > read that.
>>
>> That's for device-dax, which is basically a poor man's PMEM_IMMUTABLE
>> via a character device interface. It's useful for cases where you want
>> an entire nvdimm namespace/volume in "no fs-metadata to worry about"
>> mode. But, for sub-allocations of a namespace and support for
>> existing tooling, PMEM_IMMUTABLE is much more usable.
>
> Well sure... but otoh I was thinking that it'd be pretty neat if we
> could use the same code regardless of whether the target file was a
> dax-device or an xfs file:
>
> fd = open("<some path>", O_RDWR);
> fstat(fd, &statbuf):
> fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_PMEM_IMMUTABLE, 0, statbuf.st_size);
> p = mmap(NULL, statbuf.st_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, fd, 0);
>
> *(p + 42) = 0xDEADBEEF;
> asm { clflush; } /* or whatever */
>
> ...so perhaps it would be a good idea to design the fallocate primitive
> around "prepare this fd for mmap-only pmem semantics" and let it the
> backend do zeroing and inode flag changes as necessary to make it
> happen. We'd need to do some bikeshedding about what the other falloc
> flags mean when we're dealing with pmem files and devices, but I think
> we should try to keep the userland presentation the same unless there's
> a really good reason not to.
It would be interesting to use fallocate to size device-dax files...
However, the fallocate userland presentation I was looking to unify
was the semantic for how to clear errors. The current method for
creating a device-dax instance is 'echo "<some size>" > "<some sysfs
file>"'. Christoph put the kibosh on carrying the
fallocate-error-clearing semantic over, so we'll need to fallback to
using the existing ND_IOCTL_CLEAR_ERROR. All that's missing for error
clearing is a secondary mechanism to report the media error list for a
physical address range.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists