[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r350gtay.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:19:17 +1300
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, ast@...com,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
sargun@...gun.me, Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
brendan.d.gregg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] perf: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:21:23PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> And please make the array the last item in the structure so that
>> expanding or contracting it does not affect the ability to read the rest
>> of the structure.
>
> Sorry, sample_id must be last, because hysterical crud :/
>
> (basically because that was the only way to add a field to records like
> PERF_RECORD_MMAP which used the record length to determine the
> filename[] length, yes I know, we won't ever do that again).
Why does historical crud need to affect new records?
Totally confused. This looks like a major mess.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists