[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABV8kRxLJo=nXXpP-y2YGaPaodahkckLm=o-QTPU9Njkgjpf7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:19:38 -0500
From: Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Why do Zombie process' /proc entries have uid 0?
This is mostly out of curiosity, but I was surprised by the behavior, so
I was hoping somebody might be able to explain why this behavior was
chosen. In particular, consider any zombie process, e.g.
$ cat /proc/77078/status
Name: test
State: Z (zombie)
Tgid: 77078
Ngid: 0
Pid: 77078
PPid: 77077
TracerPid: 0
Uid: 1000 1000 1000 1000
Gid: 1000 1000 1000 1000
[...]
now, this process has uid 1000, as does the /proc/<pid> directory
$ stat /proc/77078
File: '/proc/77078'
Access: (0555/dr-xr-xr-x) Uid: ( 1000/ keno) Gid: ( 1000/ keno)
but most files in /proc/<pid> are owned by root:
$ stat /proc/77078/status
File: '/proc/77078/status'
Access: (0444/-r--r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Why is this? Why don't these files remain owned by the same uid as the
process itself?
Keno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists