| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOAejn3sc1F8T_rbSTr6-wBNncNwObeK+c6=_Q0BMahDdHXxQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:41:15 +0100
From: "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] i2c: Add STM32F4 I2C driver
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for your comments.
Please see below my answers and one question regarding duty cycle:
2016-12-23 10:00 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:35:01PM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
>> This patch adds support for the STM32F4 I2C controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c | 896 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 907 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> index 0cdc844..2719208 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> @@ -886,6 +886,16 @@ config I2C_ST
>> This driver can also be built as module. If so, the module
>> will be called i2c-st.
>>
>> +config I2C_STM32F4
>> + tristate "STMicroelectronics STM32F4 I2C support"
>> + depends on ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST
>> + help
>> + Enable this option to add support for STM32 I2C controller embedded
>> + in STM32F4 SoCs.
>> +
>> + This driver can also be built as module. If so, the module
>> + will be called i2c-stm32f4.
>> +
>> config I2C_STU300
>> tristate "ST Microelectronics DDC I2C interface"
>> depends on MACH_U300
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> index 1c1bac8..a2c6ff5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SH_MOBILE) += i2c-sh_mobile.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SIMTEC) += i2c-simtec.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SIRF) += i2c-sirf.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ST) += i2c-st.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_STM32F4) += i2c-stm32f4.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_STU300) += i2c-stu300.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SUN6I_P2WI) += i2c-sun6i-p2wi.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA) += i2c-tegra.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ca11dee
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,896 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Driver for STMicroelectronics STM32 I2C controller
>> + *
>> + * This I2C controller is described in the STM32F429/439 Soc reference manual.
>> + * Please see below a link to the documentation:
>> + * http://www.st.com/resource/en/reference_manual/DM00031020.pdf
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) M'boumba Cedric Madianga 2016
>> + * Author: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
>> + *
>> + * This driver is based on i2c-st.c
>> + *
>> + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C offset registers */
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR1 0x00
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR2 0x04
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_DR 0x10
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1 0x14
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR2 0x18
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CCR 0x1C
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_TRISE 0x20
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_FLTR 0x24
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C control 1*/
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR1_SWRST BIT(15)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR1_POS BIT(11)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK BIT(10)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP BIT(9)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START BIT(8)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR1_PE BIT(0)
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C control 2 */
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ(n) (((n) & STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ_MASK))
>
> ((n) & STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ_MASK)
>
> should be enough.
You are right. I will fix it in the V8.
>
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN BIT(10)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITEVTEN BIT(9)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITERREN BIT(8)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CR2_IRQ_MASK (STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN | \
>> + STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITEVTEN | \
>> + STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITERREN)
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C Status 1 */
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_AF BIT(10)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ARLO BIT(9)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_BERR BIT(8)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_TXE BIT(7)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_RXNE BIT(6)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_BTF BIT(2)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ADDR BIT(1)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_SB BIT(0)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ITEVTEN_MASK (STM32F4_I2C_SR1_BTF | \
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ADDR | \
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SR1_SB)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ITBUFEN_MASK (STM32F4_I2C_SR1_TXE | \
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SR1_RXNE)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ITERREN_MASK (STM32F4_I2C_SR1_AF | \
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ARLO | \
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SR1_BERR)
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C Status 2 */
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_SR2_BUSY BIT(1)
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C Control Clock */
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CCR_CCR_MASK GENMASK(11, 0)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CCR_CCR(n) (((n) & STM32F4_I2C_CCR_CCR_MASK))
>
> ditto
ok
>
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CCR_FS BIT(15)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_CCR_DUTY BIT(14)
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C Trise */
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_TRISE_VALUE_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_TRISE_VALUE(n) (((n) & STM32F4_I2C_TRISE_VALUE_MASK))
>> +
>> +/* STM32F4 I2C Filter */
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_FLTR_DNF_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_FLTR_DNF(n) (((n) & STM32F4_I2C_FLTR_DNF_MASK))
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_FLTR_ANOFF BIT(4)
>> +
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_MIN_FREQ 2U
>> +#define STM32F4_I2C_MAX_FREQ 42U
>> +#define HZ_TO_MHZ 1000000
>> +
>> +enum stm32f4_i2c_speed {
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_STANDARD, /* 100 kHz */
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_FAST, /* 400 kHz */
>> + STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_END,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct stm32f4_i2c_timings - per-Mode tuning parameters
>> + * @duty: Fast mode duty cycle
>> + * @scl_period: SCL low/high period in microsecond
>> + * @mul_ccr: Value to be multiplied to CCR to reach 100Khz/400Khz SCL frequency
>> + * @min_ccr: Minimum clock ctrl reg value to reach 100Khz/400Khz SCL frequency
>
> s/Khz/ kHz/
Good point. Thanks
>
>> + */
>> +struct stm32f4_i2c_timings {
>> + u32 duty;
>> + u32 scl_period;
>> + u32 mul_ccr;
>> + u32 min_ccr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct stm32f4_i2c_msg - client specific data
>> + * @addr: 8-bit slave addr, including r/w bit
>> + * @count: number of bytes to be transferred
>> + * @buf: data buffer
>> + * @result: result of the transfer
>> + * @stop: last I2C msg to be sent, i.e. STOP to be generated
>> + */
>> +struct stm32f4_i2c_msg {
>> + u8 addr;
>> + u32 count;
>> + u8 *buf;
>> + int result;
>> + bool stop;
>
> You bought the argument about alignment of = in stm32f4_i2c_driver. The
> same logic applies here.
ok
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct stm32f4_i2c_dev - private data of the controller
>> + * @adap: I2C adapter for this controller
>> + * @dev: device for this controller
>> + * @base: virtual memory area
>> + * @complete: completion of I2C message
>> + * @clk: hw i2c clock
>> + * speed: I2C clock frequency of the controller. Standard or Fast only supported
>> + * @msg: I2C transfer information
>> + */
>> +struct stm32f4_i2c_dev {
>> + struct i2c_adapter adap;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + struct completion complete;
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + int speed;
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg msg;
>> +};
>
> ditto
ok
>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In standard mode:
>> + * SCL high period = SCL low period = CCR * I2C CLK period
>> + * So, CCR = SCL period * I2C CLK frequency
>
> is "SCL period" the same as "SCL low period"? I2C CLK frequency is the
> input clk? If so, it's confusing that it has I2C in its name. The
> reference manual calls it PCLK1 (parent clock?).
SCL high period = SCL low period
I2C CLK frequency = I2C parent clock frequency so I will add this
precision in the V8
>
>> + * In fast mode:
>> + * DUTY = 0: Fast mode tlow/thigh = 2
>> + * DUTY = 1: Fast mode tlow/thigh = 16/9
>> + * If Duty = 0; SCL high period = 1 * CCR * I2C CLK period
>> + * SCL low period = 2 * CCR * I2C CLK period
>> + * If Duty = 1; SCL high period = 9 * CCR * I2C CLK period
>> + * SCL low period = 16 * CCR * I2C CLK period
>
> I'd drop the first two lines about the proportions
>
>> + *
>> + * Note that Duty has to bet set to reach 400khz in Fast mode
>
> s/khz/ kHz/
Ok. Thanks.
>
> I don't understand why DUTY is required to reach 400 kHz. Given a parent
> freq of 30 MHz, with CCR = 25 and DUTY = 0 we have:
>
> t_high = 25 * 33.333 ns = 833.333 ns
> t_low = 2 * 25 * 33.333 ns = 1666.667 ns
>
> then t_high and t_low satisfy the i2c bus specification
> (t_low > 1300 ns, t_high > 600 ns) and we have t_low + t_high = 2500 ns
> = 1 / 400 kHz.
>
> Where is the error?
Hum ok you are right. I was a bad interpretation of the datasheet.
So now it is clearer. Thanks for that.
I will correct and improve my comments in the V8.
>
>> + * So, in order to cover both SCL high/low with Duty = 1,
>> + * CCR = 16 * SCL period * I2C CLK frequency
>
> I don't get that. Actually you need to use low + high, so
> CCR = parentrate / (25 * 400 kHz), right?
With your new inputs above, I think I could use a simpler implementation:
CCR = scl_high_period * parent_rate
with scl_high_period = 5 µs in standard mode to reach 100khz
and scl_high_period = 1 µs in fast mode to reach 400khz with 1/2 or
16/9 duty cycle.
So, I am wondering if I have to let the customer setting the duty
cycle in the DT for example with "st,duty=0" or "st,duty=1" property
(0 for 1/2 and 1 for 16/9).
Or perhaps the best option it to use a default value. What is your
feeling regarding this point ?
>
>> + *
>> + * Please note that the minimum allowed value is 0x04, except in FAST DUTY mode
>> + * where the minimum allowed value is 0x01
>> + */
>> +static struct stm32f4_i2c_timings i2c_timings[] = {
>> + [STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_STANDARD] = {
>> + .mul_ccr = 1,
>> + .min_ccr = 4,
>> + .duty = 0,
>> + .scl_period = 5,
>> + },
>> + [STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_FAST] = {
>> + .mul_ccr = 16,
>> + .min_ccr = 1,
>> + .duty = 1,
>> + .scl_period = 2,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline void stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask)
>> +{
>> + writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(reg) | mask, reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask)
>> +{
>> + writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask, reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_soft_reset(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + val = readl_relaxed(reg);
>> + writel_relaxed(val | STM32F4_I2C_CR1_SWRST, reg);
>> + writel_relaxed(val, reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_disable_irq(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR2_IRQ_MASK);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_set_periph_clk_freq(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + u32 clk_rate, cr2, freq;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The minimum allowed frequency is 2 MHz, the maximum frequency is
>> + * limited by the maximum APB frequency 42 MHz
>> + */
>> + cr2 = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2);
>> + cr2 &= ~STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ_MASK;
>> + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(i2c_dev->clk);
>> + freq = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_rate, HZ_TO_MHZ);
>> + freq = clamp(freq, STM32F4_I2C_MIN_FREQ, STM32F4_I2C_MAX_FREQ);
>> + cr2 |= STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ(freq);
>> + writel_relaxed(cr2, i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2);
>
> Last round I suggested error checking here instead of silent clamping.
Ok
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_set_rise_time(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + u32 trise, freq, cr2;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * These bits must be programmed with the maximum SCL rise time given in
>> + * the I2C bus specification, incremented by 1.
>> + *
>> + * In standard mode, the maximum allowed SCL rise time is 1000 ns.
>> + * If, in the I2C_CR2 register, the value of FREQ[5:0] bits is equal to
>> + * 0x08 so period = 125 ns therefore the TRISE[5:0] bits must be
>> + * programmed with 09h.(1000 ns / 125 ns = 8 + 1)
>> + * So, for I2C standard mode TRISE = FREQ[5:0] + 1
>> + *
>> + * In fast mode, the maximum allowed SCL rise time is 300 ns.
>> + * If, in the I2C_CR2 register, the value of FREQ[5:0] bits is equal to
>> + * 0x08 so period = 125 ns therefore the TRISE[5:0] bits must be
>> + * programmed with 03h.(300 ns / 125 ns = 2 + 1)
>> + * So, for I2C fast mode TRISE = FREQ[5:0] * 300 / 1000 + 1
>> + */
>> +
>> + cr2 = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2);
>> + freq = cr2 & STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ_MASK;
>> +
>> + if (i2c_dev->speed == STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_STANDARD)
>> + trise = freq + 1;
>> + else
>> + trise = freq * 300 / 1000 + 1;
>
> if freq is big such that freq * 300 overflows does this result in a
> wrong result, or does the compiler optimize correctly?
For sure the compiler will never exceeds u32 max value
>
>> + writel_relaxed(STM32F4_I2C_TRISE_VALUE(trise),
>> + i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_TRISE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_set_speed_mode(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_timings *t = &i2c_timings[i2c_dev->speed];
>> + u32 cr2, ccr, freq, val;
>> +
>> + ccr = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CCR);
>> + ccr &= ~(STM32F4_I2C_CCR_FS | STM32F4_I2C_CCR_DUTY |
>> + STM32F4_I2C_CCR_CCR_MASK);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Please see the comments above regarding i2c_timings[] declaration
>> + * to understand the below calculation
>> + */
>> + cr2 = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2);
>> + freq = cr2 & STM32F4_I2C_CR2_FREQ_MASK;
>> + val = freq * t->scl_period * t->mul_ccr;
>> + if (val < t->min_ccr)
>> + val = t->min_ccr;
>> + ccr |= STM32F4_I2C_CCR_CCR(val);
>> +
>> + if (t->duty)
>> + ccr |= STM32F4_I2C_CCR_FS | STM32F4_I2C_CCR_DUTY;
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(ccr, i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CCR);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_set_filter(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + u32 filter;
>> +
>> + /* Enable analog noise filter and disable digital noise filter */
>> + filter = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_FLTR);
>> + filter &= ~(STM32F4_I2C_FLTR_ANOFF | STM32F4_I2C_FLTR_DNF_MASK);
>> + writel_relaxed(filter, i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_FLTR);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_hw_config() - Prepare I2C block
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + */
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_hw_config(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> +
>> + /* Disable I2C */
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_PE);
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_periph_clk_freq(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_rise_time(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_speed_mode(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_filter(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + /* Enable I2C */
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_PE);
>
> This is the first write to STM32F4_I2C_CR1, right? So the state from the
> bootloader leaks here. This probably works most of the time, but if it
> makes problems later, that's hard to debug. Also, what if the bootloader
> already did some i2c transfers and kept the PE bit 1? I read in the
> manual that PE must be 0 for some things. So this only works most of the
> time.
The first thing I do before configuring I2C device is to clear PE bit
in order to disable I2C.
In that way, all previous config will be erased by the new one.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stm32f4_i2c_wait_free_bus(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + u32 status;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2,
>> + status,
>> + !(status & STM32F4_I2C_SR2_BUSY),
>> + 10, 1000);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "bus not free\n");
>
> drop error message please or degrade to dev_debug
ok I will use a dev_dbg message
>
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_write_ byte() - Write a byte in the data register
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + * @byte: Data to write in the register
>> + */
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_write_byte(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u8 byte)
>> +{
>> + writel_relaxed(byte, i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_DR);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_write_msg() - Fill the data register in write mode
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + *
>> + * This function fills the data register with I2C transfer buffer
>> + */
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_write_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_write_byte(i2c_dev, *msg->buf++);
>> + msg->count--;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + u32 rbuf;
>> +
>> + rbuf = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_DR);
>> + *msg->buf++ = rbuf & 0xff;
>> + msg->count--;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_disable_irq(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + if (msg->stop)
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP);
>> + else
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
>> +
>> + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_write() - Handle FIFO empty interrupt in case of write
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + */
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_write(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> +
>> + if (msg->count) {
>> + stm32f4_i2c_write_msg(i2c_dev);
>> + if (!msg->count) {
>> + /* Disable buffer interrupts for RXNE/TXE events */
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer(i2c_dev);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_read() - Handle FIFO empty interrupt in case of read
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + */
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_read(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> +
>> + switch (msg->count) {
>> + case 1:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_disable_irq(i2c_dev);
>> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + case 3:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_btf() - Handle byte transfer finished interrupt
>> + * in case of read
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + */
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_btf(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg;
>> + u32 mask;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + switch (msg->count) {
>> + case 2:
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + /* Generate STOP or repeated Start */
>> + if (msg->stop)
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP);
>> + else
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
>> +
>> + /* Read two last data bytes */
>> + for (i = 2; i > 0; i--)
>> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + /* Disable events and error interrupts */
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> + mask = STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITEVTEN | STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITERREN;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, mask);
>> +
>> + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> + break;
>> + case 3:
>> + /* Enable ACK and read data */
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_addr() - Handle address matched interrupt in case of
>> + * master receiver
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + */
>> +static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_addr(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg;
>> +
>> + switch (msg->count) {
>> + case 0:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_terminate_xfer(i2c_dev);
>> + /* Clear ADDR flag */
>> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + /*
>> + * Single byte reception:
>> + * Enable NACK, clear ADDR flag and generate STOP or RepSTART
>> + */
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> + if (msg->stop)
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP);
>> + else
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + /*
>> + * 2-byte reception:
>> + * Enable NACK and set POS
>> + */
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_POS);
>> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + /* N-byte reception: Enable ACK */
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_ACK);
>> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +}
>
> This is still not really understandable.
I have already added some comments from datasheet to explain the
different cases.
I don't see how I could be more understandable as it is clearly the
hardware way of working...
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_isr_event() - Interrupt routine for I2C bus event
>> + * @irq: interrupt number
>> + * @data: Controller's private data
>> + */
>> +static irqreturn_t stm32f4_i2c_isr_event(int irq, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = data;
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg;
>> + u32 status, possible_status, ien;
>> + int flag;
>> +
>> + ien = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2);
>> + ien &= STM32F4_I2C_CR2_IRQ_MASK;
>> + possible_status = 0;
>
> This can already be done when declaring possible_status.
Ok.
>
>> +
>> + /* Check possible status combinations */
>> + if (ien & STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITEVTEN) {
>> + possible_status = STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ITEVTEN_MASK;
>> + if (ien & STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN)
>> + possible_status |= STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ITBUFEN_MASK;
>> + }
>> +
>> + status = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR1);
>> +
>> + if (!(status & possible_status)) {
>> + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev,
>> + "spurious evt irq (status=0x%08x, ien=0x%08x)\n",
>> + status, ien);
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + while (status & possible_status) {
>> + /* Use __fls() to check error bits first */
>> + flag = __fls(status & possible_status);
>> +
>> + switch (1 << flag) {
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_SB:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_write_byte(i2c_dev, msg->addr);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ADDR:
>> + if (msg->addr & I2C_M_RD)
>> + stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_addr(i2c_dev);
>> + else
>> + readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR2);
>> +
>> + /* Enable buffer interrupts for RXNE/TXE events */
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITBUFEN);
>> + possible_status |= STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ITBUFEN_MASK;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_BTF:
>> + if (msg->addr & I2C_M_RD)
>> + stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_btf(i2c_dev);
>> + else
>> + stm32f4_i2c_handle_write(i2c_dev);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_TXE:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_handle_write(i2c_dev);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_RXNE:
>> + stm32f4_i2c_handle_read(i2c_dev);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev,
>> + "evt irq unhandled: status=0x%08x)\n",
>> + status);
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> + }
>> + status &= ~(1 << flag);
>> + }
>
> I wouldn't do this in a loop. Just do:
>
> if (status & STM32F4_I2C_SR1_SB) {
> ...
> }
>
> if (status & ...) {
>
> }
ok but I would prefer something like that:
flag = status & possible_status
if (flag & STM32F4_I2C_SR1_SB) {
...
}
if (flag & ...) {
}
>
> Then it's obvious by reading the code in which order they are handled
> without the need to check the definitions. Do you really need to jugle
> with possible_status?
I think I have to use possible_status as some events could occur
whereas the corresponding interrupt is disabled.
For example, for a 2 byte-reception, we don't have to take into accout
RXNE event so the corresponding interrupt is disabled.
If I don't check possible_status, I will call
stm32f4_i2c_handle_read() for nothing and generates unneeded registers
accesses.
>
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_isr_error() - Interrupt routine for I2C bus error
>> + * @irq: interrupt number
>> + * @data: Controller's private data
>> + */
>> +static irqreturn_t stm32f4_i2c_isr_error(int irq, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = data;
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg;
>> + u32 status, possible_status, ien;
>> + int flag;
>> +
>> + ien = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2);
>> + ien &= STM32F4_I2C_CR2_IRQ_MASK;
>> + possible_status = 0;
>> +
>> + /* Check possible status combinations */
>> + if (ien & STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITERREN)
>> + possible_status = STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ITERREN_MASK;
>> +
>> + status = readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR1);
>> +
>> + if (!(status & possible_status)) {
>> + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev,
>> + "spurious err it (status=0x%08x, ien=0x%08x)\n",
>> + status, ien);
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Use __fls() to check error bits first */
>> + flag = __fls(status & possible_status);
>> +
>> + switch (1 << flag) {
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_BERR:
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR1;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_SR1_BERR);
>> + msg->result = -EIO;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ARLO:
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_SR1;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_SR1_ARLO);
>> + msg->result = -EAGAIN;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case STM32F4_I2C_SR1_AF:
>> + reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_STOP);
>> + msg->result = -EIO;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev,
>> + "err it unhandled: status=0x%08x)\n", status);
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> + }
>
> You only check a single irq flag here.
Yes only the first error could be reported to the i2c clients via
msg->result that's why I don't check all errors.
Moreover, as soon as an error occurs, the I2C device is reset.
>
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_soft_reset(i2c_dev);
>> + stm32f4_i2c_disable_irq(i2c_dev);
>> + complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_xfer_msg() - Transfer a single I2C message
>> + * @i2c_dev: Controller's private data
>> + * @msg: I2C message to transfer
>> + * @is_first: first message of the sequence
>> + * @is_last: last message of the sequence
>> + */
>> +static int stm32f4_i2c_xfer_msg(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
>> + struct i2c_msg *msg, bool is_first,
>> + bool is_last)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_msg *f4_msg = &i2c_dev->msg;
>> + void __iomem *reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR1;
>> + unsigned long timeout;
>> + u32 mask;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + f4_msg->addr = i2c_8bit_addr_from_msg(msg);
>> + f4_msg->buf = msg->buf;
>> + f4_msg->count = msg->len;
>> + f4_msg->result = 0;
>> + f4_msg->stop = is_last;
>> +
>> + reinit_completion(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> +
>> + /* Enable events and errors interrupts */
>> + mask = STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITEVTEN | STM32F4_I2C_CR2_ITERREN;
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2, mask);
>> +
>> + if (is_first) {
>> + ret = stm32f4_i2c_wait_free_bus(i2c_dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* START generation */
>> + stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
>> + }
>> +
>> + timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
>> + i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
>> + ret = f4_msg->result;
>> +
>> + /* Disable PEC position Ack */
>> + stm32f4_i2c_clr_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_POS);
>
> This is the only place mentioning PEC. Should this be about POS instead?
Yes you are right. Thanks
>
>> +
>> + if (!timeout)
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32f4_i2c_xfer() - Transfer combined I2C message
>> + * @i2c_adap: Adapter pointer to the controller
>> + * @msgs: Pointer to data to be written.
>> + * @num: Number of messages to be executed
>> + */
>> +static int stm32f4_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
>> + int num)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(i2c_adap);
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> + ret = clk_enable(i2c_dev->clk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "Failed to enable clock\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + stm32f4_i2c_hw_config(i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num && !ret; i++)
>> + ret = stm32f4_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[i], i == 0,
>> + i == num - 1);
>> +
>> + clk_disable(i2c_dev->clk);
>> +
>> + return (ret < 0) ? ret : num;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 stm32f4_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>> +{
>> + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_algorithm stm32f4_i2c_algo = {
>> + .master_xfer = stm32f4_i2c_xfer,
>> + .functionality = stm32f4_i2c_func,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int stm32f4_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + u32 irq_event, irq_error, clk_rate;
>> + struct i2c_adapter *adap;
>> + struct reset_control *rst;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + i2c_dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*i2c_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!i2c_dev)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + i2c_dev->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(i2c_dev->base))
>> + return PTR_ERR(i2c_dev->base);
>> +
>> + irq_event = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
>> + if (!irq_event) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ event missing or invalid\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + irq_error = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
>> + if (!irq_error) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ error missing or invalid\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i2c_dev->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(i2c_dev->clk)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error: Missing controller clock\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(i2c_dev->clk);
>> + }
>> + ret = clk_prepare(i2c_dev->clk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "Failed to prepare clock\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rst)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error: Missing controller reset\n");
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(rst);
>> + goto clk_free;
>> + }
>> + reset_control_assert(rst);
>> + udelay(2);
>> + reset_control_deassert(rst);
>> +
>> + i2c_dev->speed = STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_STANDARD;
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &clk_rate);
>> + if (!ret && clk_rate >= 40000)
>> + i2c_dev->speed = STM32F4_I2C_SPEED_FAST;
>> +
>> + i2c_dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_event, stm32f4_i2c_isr_event, 0,
>> + pdev->name, i2c_dev);
>
> Starting here this irq might trigger. Can this happen? If so,
> stm32f4_i2c_isr_event is called without the adapter being registered.
> Probably not an issue as the controller was just reset.
No irq could be triggered as after resett, the I2C is not enable as PE bit = 0.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request irq event %i\n",
>> + irq_event);
>> + goto clk_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_error, stm32f4_i2c_isr_error, 0,
>> + pdev->name, i2c_dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request irq error %i\n",
>> + irq_error);
>> + goto clk_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + adap = &i2c_dev->adap;
>> + i2c_set_adapdata(adap, i2c_dev);
>> + snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "STM32 I2C(%pa)", &res->start);
>> + adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> + adap->timeout = 2 * HZ;
>> + adap->retries = 0;
>> + adap->algo = &stm32f4_i2c_algo;
>> + adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> + adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +
>> + init_completion(&i2c_dev->complete);
>> +
>> + ret = i2c_add_adapter(adap);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto clk_free;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c_dev);
>> +
>> + dev_info(i2c_dev->dev, "STM32F4 I2C driver registered\n");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +clk_free:
>> + clk_unprepare(i2c_dev->clk);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stm32f4_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + i2c_del_adapter(&i2c_dev->adap);
>> +
>> + clk_unprepare(i2c_dev->clk);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stm32f4_i2c_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "st,stm32f4-i2c", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32f4_i2c_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver stm32f4_i2c_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "stm32f4-i2c",
>> + .of_match_table = stm32f4_i2c_match,
>> + },
>> + .probe = stm32f4_i2c_probe,
>> + .remove = stm32f4_i2c_remove,
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_platform_driver(stm32f4_i2c_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics STM32F4 I2C driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists