linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: net: ethernet: 3com: fix return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161224.195654.1632303818126752071.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 24 Dec 2016 19:56:54 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     thomas.preisner+linux@....de
Cc:     sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, dave@...dillows.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de, milan.stephan+linux@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers: net: ethernet: 3com: fix return value

It is never, ever, appropriate to use the same exact Subject: line
text for two different changes.

Someone looking at "git shortlog" has no way to know what is different
between the two changes.

You must put care and time into constructing Subject: lines because
this text is critical for data mining and analysis done by both humans
and machines.