linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: pca9532: fix device_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612292238300.2245@hadrien>
Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2016 22:39:54 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
cc:     Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
        Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@....fi>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kbuild-all@...org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: pca9532: fix device_node_continue.cocci warnings



On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:

> Hi Julia,
>
> This patch doesn't apply to current for-next branch
> of linux-leds.git.

The information about where it comes from is below the ---.  It's
automatically send to me by kbuild, so I don't know anything more than
that.  I recall from the original message that the code was committed
around an hour ago.

julia

> Best regards,
> Jacek Anaszewski
>
> On 12/29/2016 10:10 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Device node iterators put the previous value of the index variable, so an
> > explicit put causes a double put.
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/device_node_continue.cocci
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I haven't looked at the context in detail, but given the rule, I assume
> > that there is an iterator, such as for_each_child_of_node, and these
> > iterators do a put on each iteration, so none is needed in the loop body.
> >
> > tree:   https://github.com/manabian/linux-lpc lpc18xx_43xx_devel
> > head:   9ee5f58bbb16c08da223c4b4933457e0eb72268d
> > commit: c58957273142be779f62c17fae389ce9c134139f [44/55] leds: pca9532: use
> >
> >  leds-pca9532.c |    3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca9532.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca9532.c
> > @@ -473,7 +473,6 @@ pca9532_of_populate_pdata(struct device
> >
> >  		res = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
> >  		if ((res != 0) || (reg >= maxleds)) {
> > -			of_node_put(child);
> >  			continue;
> >  		}
> >
> > @@ -484,8 +483,6 @@ pca9532_of_populate_pdata(struct device
> >  		of_property_read_u32(child, "type", &pdata->leds[reg].type);
> >  		of_property_read_string(child, "linux,default-trigger",
> >  					&pdata->leds[reg].default_trigger);
> > -
> > -		of_node_put(child);
> >  	}
> >
> >  	return pdata;
> >
>
>