[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1483356603.9552.197.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 13:30:03 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vireshk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: dmaengine: dw-dmac: Custom cyclic API (Why?)
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 15:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:38:00AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-12-30 at 12:05 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > > ++dw-dmac Maintainers
> > I used to have some semi-finished patch to switch to generic API,
> > though
> > at that point I had no means to test it.
> >
> > Since I eventually got iDMA 32-bit, which is used as LPE Audio DMA
> > engine, support in my branch I might test it in the future, though I
> > think someone else would be much faster than me.
>
> no we can't, since the DSP is involved and takes control, so unless we
> do
> lots of nasty hacks, it won't be testable. I don't see the ROI for
> such an
> effort.
Thanks for clarification
> btw, feel free to test and send patches if you have such a h/w
Actually we have AVR32 connected to our lab. So, I can test it there,
but I rather need a patch to use some dummy stub instead of codec (it
has no codec connected).
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists