linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: exynos: Late mach/soc for v4.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <c727069c-c21e-be4d-89f9-f27e1c6b9af2@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 02 Jan 2017 18:25:44 +0100
From:   Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, arm@...nel.org,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: exynos: Late mach/soc for v4.10

On 01/02/2017 04:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 12/30/2016 04:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Any comments on this? I guess it won't come as late-late-4.10, so can
>>> you pull it for v4.11?
>>  
>>>> Sylwester Nawrocki (1):
>>>>       ARM: S3C24XX: Add DMA slave maps for remaining s3c24xx SoCs
>> We need this patch in v4.10 to avoid possible I2S and MMC regressions
>> on selected s3c24xx SoC, since the DMA clients are already modified.
>> If the patch goes in only for v4.11 it would be good to mark it for 
>> inclusion in v4.10 stable kernels.  
>
> You didn't mention any strict dependencies when sending this patch...
> What do you mean by "needing patch in v4.10"? Is the code already
> not bisectable? Already broken?

Yes, unfortunately on s3c2410, s3c2412 and s3c2443.  I didn't notice
when sending patches for the s3c24xx-iis and s3c2440-sdi drivers 
the dma_slave maps were only added for s3c2440 (commit 34681d84a0f7cc2
dmaengine: s3c24xx: Add dma_slave_map for s3c2440 devices) and not for
remaining SoCs covered by these DMA client drivers.

-- 
Thanks,
Sylwester