linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: exynos: Late mach/soc for v4.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:35:16 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, arm@...nel.org,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: exynos: Late mach/soc for v4.10

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 06:25:44PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 01/02/2017 04:56 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >> On 12/30/2016 04:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> Any comments on this? I guess it won't come as late-late-4.10, so can
> >>> you pull it for v4.11?
> >>  
> >>>> Sylwester Nawrocki (1):
> >>>>       ARM: S3C24XX: Add DMA slave maps for remaining s3c24xx SoCs
> >> We need this patch in v4.10 to avoid possible I2S and MMC regressions
> >> on selected s3c24xx SoC, since the DMA clients are already modified.
> >> If the patch goes in only for v4.11 it would be good to mark it for 
> >> inclusion in v4.10 stable kernels.  
> >
> > You didn't mention any strict dependencies when sending this patch...
> > What do you mean by "needing patch in v4.10"? Is the code already
> > not bisectable? Already broken?
> 
> Yes, unfortunately on s3c2410, s3c2412 and s3c2443.  I didn't notice
> when sending patches for the s3c24xx-iis and s3c2440-sdi drivers 
> the dma_slave maps were only added for s3c2440 (commit 34681d84a0f7cc2
> dmaengine: s3c24xx: Add dma_slave_map for s3c2440 devices) and not for
> remaining SoCs covered by these DMA client drivers.

Okay, so either entire pull goes into v4.10 or I will need a resend of
this one patch with a little bit extended message why this is a v4.10
fix.

BR,
Krzysztof