[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1483434117-24427-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:01:57 +0800
From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <cm224.lee@...sung.com>,
<yuchao0@...wei.com>, <chao@...nel.org>, <sylinux@....com>,
<yunlong.song@...wei.com>
CC: <bintian.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix small discards when se->valid_blocks is zero
In the small discard case, when se->valid_blocks is zero, the add_discard_addrs
will directly return without __add_discard_entry. This will cause the file
delete have no small discard. The case is like this:
1. Allocate free 2M segment
2. Write a file (size n blocks < 512) in that 2M segment, se->valid_blocks = n
3. Delete that file, se->valid_blocks = 0, add_discard_addrs will return without
sending any discard of that file, and forever due to cur_map[i] ^ ckpt_map[i] =
0 after that checkpoint
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 0738f48..8610f14 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void add_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
return;
if (!force) {
- if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) || !se->valid_blocks ||
+ if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) ||
SM_I(sbi)->nr_discards >= SM_I(sbi)->max_discards)
return;
}
--
1.8.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists