linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix small discards when se->valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72699809-4316-0390-a09b-eb5d5fc70981@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:54:29 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <cm224.lee@...sung.com>, <chao@...nel.org>, <sylinux@....com>
CC:     <bintian.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix small discards when se->valid_blocks is zero

On 2017/1/3 17:01, Yunlong Song wrote:
> In the small discard case, when se->valid_blocks is zero, the add_discard_addrs
> will directly return without __add_discard_entry. This will cause the file
> delete have no small discard. The case is like this:
> 
> 1. Allocate free 2M segment
> 2. Write a file (size n blocks < 512) in that 2M segment, se->valid_blocks = n
> 3. Delete that file, se->valid_blocks = 0, add_discard_addrs will return without
> sending any discard of that file, and forever due to cur_map[i] ^ ckpt_map[i] =
> 0 after that checkpoint

Wouldn't it be discarded as prefree segment?

Thanks,

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 0738f48..8610f14 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void add_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (!force) {
> -		if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) || !se->valid_blocks ||
> +		if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) ||
>  		    SM_I(sbi)->nr_discards >= SM_I(sbi)->max_discards)
>  			return;
>  	}
>