linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170104150625.5da36137@lwn.net>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:06:25 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST
 backends

On Mon,  2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:

> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc
> for QEMU's documentation.  Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively
> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes.  Patches 3 to 5, instead,
> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with
> the input and output of the rST backend.
> 
> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends;
> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm
> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :)

I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll
go ahead and apply them.

Thanks,

jon