[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CFFA583C-EEF3-40D2-80F9-E66E39BE1372@darmarit.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:42:14 +0100
From: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends
Am 04.01.2017 um 23:06 schrieb Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc
>> for QEMU's documentation. Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively
>> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes. Patches 3 to 5, instead,
>> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with
>> the input and output of the rST backend.
>>
>> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends;
>> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm
>> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :)
>
> I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll
> go ahead and apply them.
Hi Paolo !
Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@vger.kernel.org/msg08503.html
but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
the patch takes effect?
Thanks,
-- Markus --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists