linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:58:29 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST
 backends



On 23/01/2017 14:42, Markus Heiser wrote:
> 
> Am 04.01.2017 um 23:06 schrieb Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>:
> 
>> On Mon,  2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100
>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc
>>> for QEMU's documentation.  Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively
>>> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes.  Patches 3 to 5, instead,
>>> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with
>>> the input and output of the rST backend.
>>>
>>> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends;
>>> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm
>>> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :)
>>
>> I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll
>> go ahead and apply them.
> 
> Hi Paolo !
> 
> Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:
> 
>   https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@vger.kernel.org/msg08503.html
> 
> but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
> you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
> the patch takes effect?

I found this with QEMU.  You need to test with an inline function which
has attributes with arguments.

Paolo