linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E90F338F-59F8-44E1-AF60-741EA1123B4D@darmarit.de>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:38:26 +0100
From:   Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends


Am 23.01.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>:
>> 
>> Hi Paolo !
>> 
>> Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:
>> 
>>  https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@vger.kernel.org/msg08503.html
>> 
>> but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
>> you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
>> the patch takes effect?
> 
> I found this with QEMU.  You need to test with an inline function which
> has attributes with arguments.

Ah, mostly about QEMU .. OK now I see also a small effect on kernel's source:

  https://github.com/return42/sphkerneldoc/commit/cecfe275

Sorry for the noise.

-- Markus --