[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c61db43c-82b1-b4c9-63cb-a8c78878cb39@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:11:35 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"yong.wu@...iatek.com" <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Drop the of_iommu_{set/get}_ops() interface
[+Yong Wu for mtk_iommu]
On 03/01/17 17:34, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> With the introduction of the new iommu_{register/get}_instance()
> interface in commit e4f10ffe4c9b ("iommu: Make of_iommu_set/get_ops() DT
> agnostic") (based on struct fwnode_handle as look-up token, so firmware
> agnostic) to register IOMMU instances with the core IOMMU layer there is
> no reason to keep the old OF based interface around any longer.
>
> Convert all the IOMMU drivers (and OF IOMMU core code) that rely on the
> of_iommu_{set/get}_ops() to the new kernel interface to register/retrieve
> IOMMU instances and remove the of_iommu_{set/get}_ops() remaining glue
> code in order to complete the interface rework.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Looking at before-and-after disassemblies, of_iommu.o is binary
identical, and exynos-iommu.o differs only in the use of dev->fwnode
rather than &dev->of_node->fwnode (and is binary identical if I hack it
back to the latter). I'm not sure why the (GCC 6.2) codegen for
mtk_iommu.o changes quite so much when merely replacing a callsite with
the contents of its static inline callee, but it does :/
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> Exynos, msm and mtk code compile tested only owing to lack of
> test platforms, I would appreciate some help in testing this
> patch on those platforms before merging it even if it is just
> a simple interface conversion.
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
> drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/of_iommu.h | 11 -----------
> 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> index 57ba0d3..b79e4c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static int __init exynos_sysmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>
> - of_iommu_set_ops(dev->of_node, &exynos_iommu_ops);
> + iommu_register_instance(dev->fwnode, &exynos_iommu_ops);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> index b09692b..9cd3cee 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static int msm_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> list_add(&iommu->dev_node, &qcom_iommu_devices);
> - of_iommu_set_ops(pdev->dev.of_node, &msm_iommu_ops);
> + iommu_register_instance(pdev->dev.fwnode, &msm_iommu_ops);
>
> pr_info("device mapped at %p, irq %d with %d ctx banks\n",
> iommu->base, iommu->irq, iommu->ncb);
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 1479c76..0596ab2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_init_fn(struct device_node *np)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - of_iommu_set_ops(np, &mtk_iommu_ops);
> + iommu_register_instance(&np->fwnode, &mtk_iommu_ops);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> index 0f57ddc..d7f480a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops
> "iommu-map-mask", &iommu_spec.np, iommu_spec.args))
> return NULL;
>
> - ops = of_iommu_get_ops(iommu_spec.np);
> + ops = iommu_get_instance(&iommu_spec.np->fwnode);
> if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate ||
> iommu_fwspec_init(&pdev->dev, &iommu_spec.np->fwnode, ops) ||
> ops->of_xlate(&pdev->dev, &iommu_spec))
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
> "#iommu-cells", idx,
> &iommu_spec)) {
> np = iommu_spec.np;
> - ops = of_iommu_get_ops(np);
> + ops = iommu_get_instance(&np->fwnode);
>
> if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate ||
> iommu_fwspec_init(dev, &np->fwnode, ops) ||
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_iommu.h b/include/linux/of_iommu.h
> index 6a7fc50..13394ac 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_iommu.h
> @@ -31,17 +31,6 @@ static inline const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_OF_IOMMU */
>
> -static inline void of_iommu_set_ops(struct device_node *np,
> - const struct iommu_ops *ops)
> -{
> - iommu_register_instance(&np->fwnode, ops);
> -}
> -
> -static inline const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_get_ops(struct device_node *np)
> -{
> - return iommu_get_instance(&np->fwnode);
> -}
> -
> extern struct of_device_id __iommu_of_table;
>
> typedef int (*of_iommu_init_fn)(struct device_node *);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists