lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG5mAdzxUhhwjBLWZw6aX_--oAOB0Mbc3+Do-TpNRPqGcC8YVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:31:42 -0800
From:   ccrome <ccrome@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaud Mouiche <arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:22:57AM -0800, Caleb Crome wrote:
> > From: Caleb Crome <caleb@...me.org>
> >
> > The fsl_ssi fifo watermark is by default set to 2 free spaces (i.e.
> > activate DMA on FIFO when only 2 spaces are left.)  This means the
>
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> patches.  Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
> doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
> doing.

Shoot, yes of course.  I forgot to check the subject format against
extant patches.

The subject should be

[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

Correct?

Should I re-submit?

Thanks,
 -Caleb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ