[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG5mAdzxUhhwjBLWZw6aX_--oAOB0Mbc3+Do-TpNRPqGcC8YVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:31:42 -0800
From: ccrome <ccrome@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaud Mouiche <arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:22:57AM -0800, Caleb Crome wrote:
> > From: Caleb Crome <caleb@...me.org>
> >
> > The fsl_ssi fifo watermark is by default set to 2 free spaces (i.e.
> > activate DMA on FIFO when only 2 spaces are left.) This means the
>
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
> doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
> doing.
Shoot, yes of course. I forgot to check the subject format against
extant patches.
The subject should be
[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value
Correct?
Should I re-submit?
Thanks,
-Caleb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists