linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:35:50 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     ccrome <ccrome@...il.com>
Cc:     Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaud Mouiche <arnaud.mouiche@...oxia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:31:42AM -0800, ccrome wrote:

> The subject should be
> 
> [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: set fifo watermark to more reliable value
> 
> Correct?

Yes.

> Should I re-submit?

No, it's fine - if I'm sending one of those mails it'll be fine as I've
actually seen the mail to reply to it, the problem is if I don't see the
mail.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)