[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170105061745.GA9679@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:17:45 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] crash: move crashkernel parsing and vmcore
related code under CONFIG_CRASH_CORE
Hi, Hari
On 01/02/17 at 07:43pm, Hari Bathini wrote:
> Traditionally, kdump is used to save vmcore in case of a crash. Some
> architectures like powerpc can save vmcore using architecture specific
> support instead of kexec/kdump mechanism. Such architecture specific
> support also needs to reserve memory, to be used by dump capture kernel.
> crashkernel parameter can be a reused, for memory reservation, by such
> architecture specific infrastructure.
>
> But currently, code related to vmcoreinfo and parsing of crashkernel
> parameter is built under CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE. This patch introduces
> CONFIG_CRASH_CORE and moves the above mentioned code under this config,
> allowing code reuse without dependency on CONFIG_KEXEC. There is no
> functional change with this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Changes from v2:
> * Used CONFIG_CRASH_CORE instead of CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE at
> appropriate places in printk and ksysfs.
>
>
> arch/Kconfig | 4
> include/linux/crash_core.h | 65 ++++++
> include/linux/kexec.h | 57 ------
> include/linux/printk.h | 4
> kernel/Makefile | 1
> kernel/crash_core.c | 445 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/kexec_core.c | 404 ----------------------------------------
> kernel/ksysfs.c | 8 +
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 6 -
> 9 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 463 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/crash_core.h
> create mode 100644 kernel/crash_core.c
>
[snip]
> #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 8b26964..d0dfebd 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/bootmem.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> -#include <linux/kexec.h>
> +#include <linux/crash_core.h>
> #include <linux/kdb.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> #include <linux/kmsg_dump.h>
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ const struct file_operations kmsg_fops = {
> .release = devkmsg_release,
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_CORE
> /*
> * This appends the listed symbols to /proc/vmcore
> *
> @@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ const struct file_operations kmsg_fops = {
> * symbols are specifically used so that utilities can access and extract the
> * dmesg log from a vmcore file after a crash.
> */
> -void log_buf_kexec_setup(void)
> +void log_buf_crash_setup(void)
I can not think of any better name about the CONFIG_CRASH_CORE though I
feel it is not excellent so personally I can live with it.
But for this function name log_buf_crash_setup is too general, I can not get
what it is doing from the name, how about change it to log_buf_vmcoreinfo_setup
> {
> VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_buf);
> VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_buf_len);
>
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists