[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170105073846.GD4667@x250>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:38:48 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
Cc: jun.nie@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
krzk@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
amitdanielk@...il.com, claudiu.manoil@....com, yangbo.lu@....com,
pankaj.dubey@...sung.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xie.baoyou@....com.cn,
chen.chaokai@....com.cn, wang.qiang01@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] soc: zte: pm_domains: Add support for zx296718
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:48:14PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch introduces the power domain driver of zx296718
> which belongs to zte's zx2967 family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/zte/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> index 8a37f2f..96b7cd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
> # ZTE SOC drivers
> #
> obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx2967_pm_domains.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx296718_pm_domains.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..52003ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ZTE Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
> + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2
> + */
Please have a newline between licence declaration and headers to improve
the readability. Same for zx2967_pm_domains.c.
> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/zte,pm_domains.h>
> +#include "zx2967_pm_domains.h"
> +
> +static u16 zx296718_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
> + [REG_CLKEN] = 0x18,
> + [REG_ISOEN] = 0x1c,
> + [REG_RSTEN] = 0x20,
> + [REG_PWREN] = 0x24,
> + [REG_ACK_SYNC] = 0x28,
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + PCU_DM_VOU = 0,
> + PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + PCU_DM_VDE,
> + PCU_DM_VCE,
> + PCU_DM_HDE,
> + PCU_DM_VIU,
> + PCU_DM_USB20,
> + PCU_DM_USB21,
> + PCU_DM_USB30,
> + PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + PCU_DM_TS,
> +};
I think we can save this enum completely by defining those
DM_ZX296718_xxx constants in zte,pm_domains.h in the same order of this
enum (hardware bit position order), so that DM_ZX296718_xxx can directly
be used as .bit field of struct zx2967_pm_domain.
#define DM_ZX296718_VOU 0
#define DM_ZX296718_SAPPU 1
#define DM_ZX296718_VDE 2 /* g1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VCE 3 /* h1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_HDE 4 /* g2v2 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VIU 5
#define DM_ZX296718_USB20 6
#define DM_ZX296718_USB21 7
#define DM_ZX296718_USB30 8
#define DM_ZX296718_HSIC 9
#define DM_ZX296718_GMAC 10
#define DM_ZX296718_TS 11
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vou_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vou_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VOU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain sappu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "sappu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vce_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vce_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VCE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain viu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "viu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VIU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb20_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb20_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB20,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb21_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb21_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB21,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb30_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb30_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB30,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hsic_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hsic_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain gmac_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "gmac_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain ts_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "ts_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_TS,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct generic_pm_domain *zx296718_pm_domains[] = {
> + [DM_ZX296718_SAPPU] = &sappu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VDE] = &vde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VCE] = &vce_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HDE] = &hde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VIU] = &viu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB20] = &usb20_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB21] = &usb21_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB30] = &usb30_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HSIC] = &hsic_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_GMAC] = &gmac_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_TS] = &ts_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VOU] = &vou_domain.dm,
If you update the order of DM_ZX296718_xxx in zte,pm_domains.h, it would
be nice to update this list accordingly as well.
> +};
> +
> +static int zx296718_pd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + return zx2967_pd_probe(pdev,
> + zx296718_pm_domains,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(zx296718_pm_domains));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id zx296718_pm_domain_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "zte,zx296718-pcu", },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zx296718_pd_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zx-powerdomain",
This is a zx296718 specific driver. So zx296718-powerdomain should
be a better name?
Shawn
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = zx296718_pm_domain_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = zx296718_pd_probe,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init zx296718_pd_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&zx296718_pd_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(zx296718_pd_init);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists