[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20170105093308.ixefvxrfhhu2u2ir@gangnam.samsung>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 18:33:08 +0900
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@...sung.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
beomho.seo@...sung.com, galaxyra@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent
from each other
Hi Chanwoo,
> >> I add the some comment as following:
> >> - ldo23/25/31/38 have the different value between tm2 and tm2e.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out. I planned to do this already in a
> > following patch as for now I think it's out from the scope of this
> > particular patch.
>
> I think it is very simple work. If you want to make the common.dtsi,
> I think that you have to separate the different thing on each exynos5433-tm2X.dts.
>
> >
> >> - The patch[1] was alread posted. I think you better to rebase this patch on patch[1].
> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9491769/
> >> - ("ARM64: dts: TM2: comply to the samsung pinctrl naming convention")
> >
> > Yes, I also thought about this, but I didn't know whether it was
> > already picked by anyone. I didn't want to stop Jaechul that's
> > why I was planning to rebase the other rather than this.
> > But you are right, because some bits of the other patches I know
> > that have been merged. Thank you!
> >
> > Krzysztof, do you mind if I send patch 3 as a reply to this
> > e-mail? The changes should not affect patch 4, anyway.
>
> No, If exynos5433-tm2.dts includes the different value of regulator,
> patch4 might be implemented based on patch3.
OK, I will re-work the patch 3 with the regulators and generate
again patch 4.
Thanks,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists