linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/1] Changes to support the driver for platform device registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3d3e9fce-faae-3ff0-c42c-20f4bced663a@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:43:56 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Raviteja Garimella <raviteja.garimella@...adcom.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] Changes to support the driver for platform device
 registration

On 01/05/2017 12:23 AM, Raviteja Garimella wrote:
> -- Add OF based platform device registration
> -- Modify debug prints to be compatible with both pci and platform devices
> -- Add members to 'struct udc' for extcon and phy support
> -- Add checks to not process repeated calls to udc connect and
>    disconnect routines
> -- Kconfig changes

What you are doing in this patch is all well and good, but since you are
listing these changes, that means we should see 4/5 patches submitted to
this driver each one doing what you have as a bullet point.

Since you are adding Device Tree probing support to the driver, you also
need to create a proper binding document which describes the properties
and nodes.

Thank you
-- 
Florian