[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1861880.7pouM4E6RB@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 23:03:08 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Raviteja Garimella <raviteja.garimella@...adcom.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] Platform driver support for 'amd5536udc' driver
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 1:53:16 PM CET Raviteja Garimella wrote:
> The UDC is based on Synopsys Designware core USB (2.0) Device controller
> IP.
...
> This is a request for comments from maintainers/others regarding approach
> on whether to have 2 different drivers (one each for AMD and Broadcom)
> with a common library (3 files in total), or have a single driver like
> it's done in this patch and have the driver filename changed to some
> common name based on ther underlying IP, like snps_udc.c.
I have not looked at the code at all, so sorry for my ignorance, but
isn't the IP block you describe the one that drivers/usb/dwc2/ is for?
Could you add support for the Broadcom hardware there instead?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists