linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent from each other

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2017 20:37:59 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
Cc:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@...sung.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        beomho.seo@...sung.com, galaxyra@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent
 from each other

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 06:23:15PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
> 
> > I add the some comment as following:
> > - ldo23/25/31/38 have the different value between tm2 and tm2e.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out. I planned to do this already in a
> following patch as for now I think it's out from the scope of this
> particular patch.
> 
> > - The patch[1] was alread posted. I think you better to rebase this patch on patch[1].
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9491769/
> > - ("ARM64: dts: TM2: comply to the samsung pinctrl naming convention")
> 
> Yes, I also thought about this, but I didn't know whether it was
> already picked by anyone. I didn't want to stop Jaechul that's
> why I was planning to rebase the other rather than this.
> But you are right, because some bits of the other patches I know
> that have been merged. Thank you!
> 
> Krzysztof, do you mind if I send patch 3 as a reply to this
> e-mail? The changes should not affect patch 4, anyway.

By patch 3 you mean this patch? Yes, you can send another version as a
reply-to but please version it (2.1? etc).

Anyway I need a proper rename detection. I pointed proper command last
time. Is it working?

Best regards,
Krzysztof