[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=zhgqKxyfj2YM6r-F7A_prS8yh61j3otKk2+kTyEOEj4F=xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:16:25 +0530
From: Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, jbaron@...mai.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sagi@...mberg.me, Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani
<suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Chaitra Basappa <chaitra.basappa@...adcom.com>,
dledford@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: fix hang on ata passthru commands
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> James> Now that I look at the reviews, each of the reviewers said what
> James> the correct thing to do was: return SAM_STAT_BUSY if SATL
> James> commands are outstanding like the spec says. You all get
> James> negative brownie points for not insisting on a rework.
>
> James> Does this patch (compile tested only) fix the problems for
> James> everyone?
>
> I also like this approach better.
>
> Broadcom folks: Please comment and test.
Matin, We are fine with this patch. Can we rename function
'set_satl_pending()' name to '_scsih_set_satl_pending()' and can add
headers to this function.
other wise I am OK.
Acked-by: Sreekanth Reddy <Sreekanth.Reddy@...adcom.com>
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists