lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201701061738.33482.luke@dashjr.org>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:38:31 +0000
From:   Luke Dashjr <luke@...hjr.org>
To:     Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>, jbacik@...com
Cc:     dsterba@...e.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clm@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, 1619918@...s.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Regression 4.7-rc1] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl

On Friday, January 06, 2017 5:22:34 PM Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>     btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in
> btrfs_ioctl
> 
> However, this commit introduced a new regression.  With this commit
> applied, "btrfs fi show" no longer works and the btrfs snapshot
> functionality breaks.

I don't see how this is even possibly related. Furthermore, "btrfs fi show" as 
well as snapshots seem to work just fine for me.

That being said, I've given up on running a 32-bit userspace, so I don't 
really care if this bugfix gets reverted or not.

Luke

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ