[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ea8d8ad-b410-b81b-5732-b5d6beca1d10@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 15:46:38 -0500
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
<luke@...hjr.org>
CC: <luke-jr+git@...pios.org>, <jbacik@...com>, <dsterba@...e.com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <1619918@...s.launchpad.net>
Subject: Re: [Regression 4.7-rc1] btrfs: bugfix: handle
FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
On 01/06/2017 12:22 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. This bug was fixed
> by the following commit in v4.7-rc1:
>
>
> commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38
>
> Author: Luke Dashjr <luke@...hjr.org>
> Date: Thu Oct 29 08:22:21 2015 +0000
>
> btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in
> btrfs_ioctl
>
>
> However, this commit introduced a new regression. With this commit
> applied, "btrfs fi show" no longer works and the btrfs snapshot
> functionality breaks.
>
>
>
> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
This is working for me, could you please include an strace of the problem?
Thanks!
-chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists