[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170108232904.GA17681@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 02:29:04 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: stop leaking PageTables
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 03:37:31PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 4.10-rc loadtest (even on x86, even without THPCache) fails with
> "fork: Cannot allocate memory" or some such; and /proc/meminfo
> shows PageTables growing.
>
> rc1 removed the freeing of an unused preallocated pagetable after
> do_fault_around() has called map_pages(): which is usually a good
> optimization, so that the followup doesn't have to reallocate one;
> but it's not sufficient to shift the freeing into alloc_set_pte(),
> since there are failure cases (most commonly VM_FAULT_RETRY) which
> never reach finish_fault().
>
> Check and free it at the outer level in do_fault(), then we don't
> need to worry in alloc_set_pte(), and can restore that to how it was
> (I cannot find any reason to pte_free() under lock as it was doing).
>
> And fix a separate pagetable leak, or crash, introduced by the same
> change, that could only show up on some ppc64: why does do_set_pmd()'s
> failure case attempt to withdraw a pagetable when it never deposited
> one, at the same time overwriting (so leaking) the vmf->prealloc_pte?
> Residue of an earlier implementation, perhaps? Delete it.
>
> Fixes: 953c66c2b22a ("mm: THP page cache support for ppc64")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Sorry, that I missed this initially.
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists