lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109132631.GA14411@ozzy.nask.waw.pl>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:26:31 +0100
From:   Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
To:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Bob Rodgers <Robert_Rodgers@...l.com>,
        Louis Davis <Louis_Davis@...l.com>,
        Jim Dailey <Jim_Dailey@...l.com>,
        Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
        Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
        Anthony Wong <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ALSA: hda - use dell_micmute_led_set() instead of
 dell_app_wmi_led_set()

> > On Thu Dec 15 15:46:28 2016 Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 08 December 2016 13:36:14 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/dell_wmi_helper.c
> > > > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/dell_wmi_helper.c
> > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > #include <linux/dell-led.h>
> > > > > 
> > > > > static int dell_led_value;
> > > > > -static int (*dell_led_set_func)(int, int);
> > > > > +static int (*dell_led_set_func)(int);
> > > > 
> > > > Suggestion: what about changing name to dell_micmute_led_set_func to 
> > > > match real function name which is used after this patch?
> > > 
> > > While I like the idea itself, implementing it will double the number of
> > > lines that this patch changes (6 vs. 12), arguably making its intention
> > 
> > If some patch makes final result of code better then metric number of lines is not priority.
> > 
> > > less clear.   Please let me know if you would really like this to happen
> > > (perhaps as a separate patch?), otherwise I will skip this idea in v2.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Michał Kępień
> > 
> > If it will be in this or another following patch... I dot care. But this is sound subsystem, so sound maintainers need to decide what they prefer.
> 
> Good point.  Jaroslav, Takashi, I will patiently wait for your opinion
> on this patch and Pali's suggestion quoted above before I post v2 of
> this series.

As it has already been a month since I posted this patch series, this is
just a reminder that I am waiting for comments from the sound subsystem
maintainers before I post v2.

Jaroslav, Takashi, I could really use your input.  Please let me know if
something is unclear.  Thanks,

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Kępień

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ