[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h8tqk1e98.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:47:47 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: "Michał Kępień" <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc: "Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"Alex Hung" <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
"Anthony Wong" <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
"Hui Wang" <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
"Jim Dailey" <Jim_Dailey@...l.com>,
"Louis Davis" <Louis_Davis@...l.com>,
"Bob Rodgers" <Robert_Rodgers@...l.com>, <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
"Jacek Anaszewski" <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ALSA: hda - use dell_micmute_led_set() instead of dell_app_wmi_led_set()
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 14:26:31 +0100,
Michał Kępień wrote:
>
> > > On Thu Dec 15 15:46:28 2016 Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 08 December 2016 13:36:14 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/dell_wmi_helper.c
> > > > > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/dell_wmi_helper.c
> > > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > > #include <linux/dell-led.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static int dell_led_value;
> > > > > > -static int (*dell_led_set_func)(int, int);
> > > > > > +static int (*dell_led_set_func)(int);
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggestion: what about changing name to dell_micmute_led_set_func to
> > > > > match real function name which is used after this patch?
> > > >
> > > > While I like the idea itself, implementing it will double the number of
> > > > lines that this patch changes (6 vs. 12), arguably making its intention
> > >
> > > If some patch makes final result of code better then metric number of lines is not priority.
> > >
> > > > less clear. Please let me know if you would really like this to happen
> > > > (perhaps as a separate patch?), otherwise I will skip this idea in v2.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Michał Kępień
> > >
> > > If it will be in this or another following patch... I dot care. But this is sound subsystem, so sound maintainers need to decide what they prefer.
> >
> > Good point. Jaroslav, Takashi, I will patiently wait for your opinion
> > on this patch and Pali's suggestion quoted above before I post v2 of
> > this series.
>
> As it has already been a month since I posted this patch series, this is
> just a reminder that I am waiting for comments from the sound subsystem
> maintainers before I post v2.
>
> Jaroslav, Takashi, I could really use your input. Please let me know if
> something is unclear. Thanks,
Sorry, the last post was overseen as I already went off to vacation.
The rename can be done in another patch. Doing multiple things in a
single patch often leads to more confusion and error-prone.
Other than that, I'm fine with rename.
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists