[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170110052853.GA1291@kmp-mobile.hq.kempniu.pl>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 06:28:53 +0100
From: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
Anthony Wong <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Jim Dailey <Jim_Dailey@...l.com>,
Louis Davis <Louis_Davis@...l.com>,
Bob Rodgers <Robert_Rodgers@...l.com>, pali.rohar@...il.com,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ALSA: hda - use dell_micmute_led_set() instead of
dell_app_wmi_led_set()
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 14:26:31 +0100,
> Michał Kępień wrote:
> >
> > > > On Thu Dec 15 15:46:28 2016 Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday 08 December 2016 13:36:14 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > > > > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/dell_wmi_helper.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/dell_wmi_helper.c
> > > > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > > > #include <linux/dell-led.h>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > static int dell_led_value;
> > > > > > > -static int (*dell_led_set_func)(int, int);
> > > > > > > +static int (*dell_led_set_func)(int);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Suggestion: what about changing name to dell_micmute_led_set_func to
> > > > > > match real function name which is used after this patch?
> > > > >
> > > > > While I like the idea itself, implementing it will double the number of
> > > > > lines that this patch changes (6 vs. 12), arguably making its intention
> > > >
> > > > If some patch makes final result of code better then metric number of lines is not priority.
> > > >
> > > > > less clear. Please let me know if you would really like this to happen
> > > > > (perhaps as a separate patch?), otherwise I will skip this idea in v2.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Michał Kępień
> > > >
> > > > If it will be in this or another following patch... I dot care. But this is sound subsystem, so sound maintainers need to decide what they prefer.
> > >
> > > Good point. Jaroslav, Takashi, I will patiently wait for your opinion
> > > on this patch and Pali's suggestion quoted above before I post v2 of
> > > this series.
> >
> > As it has already been a month since I posted this patch series, this is
> > just a reminder that I am waiting for comments from the sound subsystem
> > maintainers before I post v2.
> >
> > Jaroslav, Takashi, I could really use your input. Please let me know if
> > something is unclear. Thanks,
>
> Sorry, the last post was overseen as I already went off to vacation.
No worries, thank you for getting back to me.
> The rename can be done in another patch. Doing multiple things in a
> single patch often leads to more confusion and error-prone.
>
> Other than that, I'm fine with rename.
Thank you for your comments, I will keep them in mind for v2.
--
Best regards,
Michał Kępień
Powered by blists - more mailing lists