[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <o53clt$uo9$1@blaine.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:29:08 -0500
From: Ken Goldman <kgoldman@...ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager
On 1/9/2017 6:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> Here's my cuts for the kernel:
>
> - Kernel virtualizes handle areas. It's mechanical.
> - Kernel does not virtualize bodies. It's not mechanical.
> - At least the first version of the RM will not do other than session
> isolation for sessions.
Is it correct that "bodies" are the parameter area of the commands and
responses?
if so, eventually something should virtualize getcapability. It may be
safer in user space, but it can mask RM issues.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists