[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ziiyijo9.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:23:18 +1300
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] namespace related fixes for 4.10-rc3
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 06:29:52AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 06:30:05PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> > Eric W. Biederman (3):
>> > mnt: Protect the mountpoint hashtable with mount_lock
>> ACK
>>
>> > mnt: Tuck mounts under others instead of creating shadow/side mounts.
>>
>> NAK; you have reintroduced put_mountpoint() outside of mount lock in there
>> and you've got seriously confused umount side of the things.
>
> PS: details are in my reply (admittedly, sent only ~20 minutes
> before your pull request) to your patch. Check Message-ID
> <20170107050644.GA12074@...IV.linux.org.uk>
I suspect that was sent while I was composing my pull request, and the
locking around put_mountpoint I did fail to catch during my rebase. I
will finish our conversation about that before I resend that patch.
> My apologies for not getting to it yesterday (the patch was posted a couple of
> days ago, AFAICS) - I'd been off-net since Wednesday, just got back
> ;-/
You and Ram Pai had said reasonably pleasant things about a previous
version of that patch.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists