linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check return values from get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170110100735.GC1011@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:07:35 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, Josh Zimmerman <joshz@...gle.com>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
        "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" 
        <tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check return values from get_burstcount.

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:46:58PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: Josh Zimmerman <joshz@...gle.com>
> 
> If the TPM we're connecting to uses a static burst count, it will report
> a burst count of zero throughout the response read. However, get_burstcount
> assumes that a response of zero indicates that the TPM is not ready to
> receive more data. In this case, it returns a negative error code, which
> is passed on to tpm_tis_{write,read}_bytes as a u16, causing
> them to read/write far too many bytes.
> 
> This patch checks for negative return codes and bails out from recv_data
> and tpm_tis_send_data.
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 1107d065fdf1 (tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for TPM access)
> Signed-off-by: Josh Zimmerman <joshz@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> Backport for 4.8 and 4.9

4.8 is now end-of-life, but I've queued this up for 4.9-stable, many
thanks!

greg k-h