[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0031c2ec-5fc8-4abf-29ef-5039b0508931@st.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:08:55 +0100
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
"andrea.merello@...il.com" <andrea.merello@...il.com>,
"radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com" <radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>,
Olivier BIDEAU <olivier.bideau@...com>,
Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] clk: stm32f4: Update DT bindings documentation
On 01/09/2017 08:33 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/09, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 12/22/2016 01:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 12/13, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
>>>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>>>>
>>>> Creation of dt include file for specific stm32f4 clocks.
>>>> These specific clocks are not derived from system clock (SYSCLOCK)
>>>> We should use index 1 to use these clocks in DT.
>>>> e.g. <&rcc 1 CLK_LSI>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Applied to clk-stm32f4 and merged into clk-next.
>>>
>>
>> I'm preparing pull request branch for STM32 DT part. This patch is
>> also requested to build correctly DT patches. Do you know how could
>> we synchronize our pull request ?
>>
>
> clk-stm32f4 is stable and not going to be rebased, so you're good
> to base patches on it and send it off to arm-soc if the arm-soc
> maintainers agree to it. You can also base off an earlier part of
> the branch if you only need this first patch for example.
>
I will base my DT branch from 4.10-rc1 + this commit (seen with Arnd)
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists