[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109193312.GN17126@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:33:12 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
"andrea.merello@...il.com" <andrea.merello@...il.com>,
"radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com" <radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>,
Olivier BIDEAU <olivier.bideau@...com>,
Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] clk: stm32f4: Update DT bindings documentation
On 01/09, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 12/22/2016 01:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 12/13, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
> >>From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
> >>
> >>Creation of dt include file for specific stm32f4 clocks.
> >>These specific clocks are not derived from system clock (SYSCLOCK)
> >>We should use index 1 to use these clocks in DT.
> >>e.g. <&rcc 1 CLK_LSI>
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
> >>Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >>---
> >
> >Applied to clk-stm32f4 and merged into clk-next.
> >
>
> I'm preparing pull request branch for STM32 DT part. This patch is
> also requested to build correctly DT patches. Do you know how could
> we synchronize our pull request ?
>
clk-stm32f4 is stable and not going to be rebased, so you're good
to base patches on it and send it off to arm-soc if the arm-soc
maintainers agree to it. You can also base off an earlier part of
the branch if you only need this first patch for example.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists