[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170110142427.GA23051@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:24:27 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
ryan.arnold@...aro.org, sid@...erved-bit.com, aph@...hat.com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org, dave.martin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] arm64: cpufeature: Track user visible fields
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:28:30PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Changes since V3:
> - Mark ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1:RDM visible
[...]
> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64isar0[] = {
> - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64ISAR0_RDM_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_ATOMICS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_CRC32_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_SHA2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_SHA1_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64ISAR0_AES_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64ISAR0_RDM_SHIFT, 4, 0),
As I said in an earlier reply, I'd like the RDM exposing to come
together with a patch presenting the corresponding HWCAP bit. But it's
fine by me if you add the HWCAP separately from this patch, in which
case my ack still stands.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists