linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] perf/amd/iommu: Modify functions to query max banks and counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:43:40 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        bp@...en8.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] perf/amd/iommu: Modify functions to query max
 banks and counters

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:33:42PM -0600, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> +static struct amd_iommu *get_amd_iommu(uint idx)
> +{
> +	uint i = 0;
> +	struct amd_iommu *iommu = NULL;
> +
> +	for_each_iommu(iommu) {
> +		if (i == idx)
> +			break;
> +		i++;
> +	}
> +	return iommu;
> +}

Sorry for missing that in the last review, but this function returns
just the last iommu in the list when there are less iommus than the
requested index.

Is that intentional? The following code checks for !iommu, so I guess
not. It should look more like this then:

	static struct amd_iommu *get_amd_iommu(uint idx)
	{
		uint i = 0;
		struct amd_iommu *iommu, *ret = NULL;

		for_each_iommu(iommu)
			if (i++ == idx) {
				ret = iommu;
				break;
			}
		return ret;
	}


Regards,

	Joerg