[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <862635a0-a4fc-066e-0a45-e8626a02775c@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:03:50 +0700
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] perf/amd/iommu: Modify functions to query max
banks and counters
On 1/10/17 21:43, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:33:42PM -0600, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
>> +static struct amd_iommu *get_amd_iommu(uint idx)
>> +{
>> + uint i = 0;
>> + struct amd_iommu *iommu = NULL;
>> +
>> + for_each_iommu(iommu) {
>> + if (i == idx)
>> + break;
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> + return iommu;
>> +}
>
> Sorry for missing that in the last review, but this function returns
> just the last iommu in the list when there are less iommus than the
> requested index.
>
> Is that intentional? The following code checks for !iommu, so I guess
> not. It should look more like this then:
>
> static struct amd_iommu *get_amd_iommu(uint idx)
> {
> uint i = 0;
> struct amd_iommu *iommu, *ret = NULL;
>
> for_each_iommu(iommu)
> if (i++ == idx) {
> ret = iommu;
> break;
> }
> return ret;
> }
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Joerg
Right.... Thanks for catching this. Do you want me to send out V8 with
this fix?
Suravee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists