[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170111065142.GB4111@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:51:42 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/206] 4.9.3-stable review
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:28:07PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:34:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.3 release.
> > There are 206 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu Jan 12 13:14:24 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 150 pass: 149 fail: 1
> Failed builds:
> avr32:merisc_defconfig
> Qemu test results:
> total: 122 pass: 122 fail: 0
>
> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
This is the "known to fail" failure, correct?
Thanks for testing these and letting me know.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists