linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/206] 4.9.3-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <341c61a3-dead-c60f-9bfd-de8359dd35c0@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:05:43 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/206] 4.9.3-stable review

On 01/10/2017 10:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:28:07PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:34:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.3 release.
>>> There are 206 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu Jan 12 13:14:24 UTC 2017.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 150 pass: 149 fail: 1
>> Failed builds:
>> 	avr32:merisc_defconfig
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 122 pass: 122 fail: 0
>>
>> Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.
>
> This is the "known to fail" failure, correct?
>

Yes, sorry, I didn't bother to spell it out.

Guenter