[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94c4d5c0-f639-eab1-6706-335977690e88@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:52:51 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 56/62] watchdog: tangox_wdt: Convert to use device managed
functions
On 01/11/2017 01:07 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> @@ -134,12 +134,15 @@ static int tangox_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> err = clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk);
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> + err = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
>> + (void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
>> + dev->clk);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>
> Hello Guenter,
>
> I would rather avoid the function pointer cast.
> How about defining an auxiliary function for the cleanup action?
>
> clk_disable_unprepare() is static inline, so gcc will have to
> define an auxiliary function either way. What do you think?
>
Not really. It would just make it more complicated to replace the
call with devm_clk_prepare_enable(), should it ever find its way
into the light of day.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists