lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6557.1484146040@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:47:20 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: correctly use 64-bit time for UUID

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

> > Is it worth abstracting out in-kernel UUID generation?
> 
> Do you mean moving it out of AFS into lib/*.c? I think the 'afs_uuid'
> structure is quite different from other UUID definitions, so that wouldn't
> work.

afs_uuid is as it is to make it easier to package into the on-wire format, but
I suspect there's no problem with using a completely random UUID instead and
divvying it up the same way.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ