[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170111152011.GC25986@lianli.shorne-pla.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:20:11 +0900
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>,
"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] cpupower: Restore format of frequency-info limit
Hi All,
Please ignore this, its a dup of the patch with the same name.
I had an slight issue with reordering patches and this got send out.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:11:15AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> The intel_pstate kselftest expects that the output of
> `cpupower frequency-info -l | tail -1 | awk ' { print $1 } '`
> to get frequency limits. This does not work after the following two
> changes.
>
> - 562e5f1a3: rework the "cpupower frequency-info" command
> (Jacob Tanenbaum) removed parsable limit output
> - ce512b840: Do not analyse offlined cpus
> (Thomas Renninger) added newline to break limit parsing more
>
> This change preserves human readable output if wanted as well as
> parsable output for scripts/tests.
>
> Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>
> Cc: "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-info.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-info.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-info.c
> index 590d12a..3e701f0 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-info.c
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-info.c
> @@ -285,20 +285,24 @@ static int get_freq_hardware(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int human)
>
> /* --hwlimits / -l */
>
> -static int get_hardware_limits(unsigned int cpu)
> +static int get_hardware_limits(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int human)
> {
> unsigned long min, max;
>
> - printf(_(" hardware limits: "));
> if (cpufreq_get_hardware_limits(cpu, &min, &max)) {
> printf(_("Not Available\n"));
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - print_speed(min);
> - printf(" - ");
> - print_speed(max);
> - printf("\n");
> + if (human) {
> + printf(_(" hardware limits: "));
> + print_speed(min);
> + printf(" - ");
> + print_speed(max);
> + printf("\n");
> + } else {
> + printf("%lu %lu\n", min, max);
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -456,7 +460,7 @@ static void debug_output_one(unsigned int cpu)
> get_related_cpus(cpu);
> get_affected_cpus(cpu);
> get_latency(cpu, 1);
> - get_hardware_limits(cpu);
> + get_hardware_limits(cpu, 1);
>
> freqs = cpufreq_get_available_frequencies(cpu);
> if (freqs) {
> @@ -622,7 +626,7 @@ int cmd_freq_info(int argc, char **argv)
> ret = get_driver(cpu);
> break;
> case 'l':
> - ret = get_hardware_limits(cpu);
> + ret = get_hardware_limits(cpu, human);
> break;
> case 'w':
> ret = get_freq_hardware(cpu, human);
> @@ -639,7 +643,6 @@ int cmd_freq_info(int argc, char **argv)
> }
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - printf("\n");
> }
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists