[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2489599.dXme8sRkvp@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:11:32 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, fkan@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Artemi Ivanov <artemi.ivanov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: avoid increasing DMA masks above what hardware supports
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 9:31:52 PM CET Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
> @@ -959,6 +990,15 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> if (!dev->archdata.dma_ops)
> dev->archdata.dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops;
>
> + /*
> + * Whatever the parent bus can set. A device must not set
> + * a DMA mask larger than this.
> + */
> + if (enforce_range)
> + dev->archdata.parent_dma_mask = size - 1;
> + else
> + dev->archdata.parent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> +
> dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent;
> __iommu_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, size, iommu);
>
Could we just pass the mask instead of the size here?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists