[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1c64dcd-5567-8164-86d1-e3bc42831e7d@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:53:35 +0300
From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, fkan@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Artemi Ivanov <artemi.ivanov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: avoid increasing DMA masks above what hardware
supports
>> @@ -959,6 +990,15 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>> if (!dev->archdata.dma_ops)
>> dev->archdata.dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Whatever the parent bus can set. A device must not set
>> + * a DMA mask larger than this.
>> + */
>> + if (enforce_range)
>> + dev->archdata.parent_dma_mask = size - 1;
>> + else
>> + dev->archdata.parent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
>> +
>> dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent;
>> __iommu_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, size, iommu);
>>
>
> Could we just pass the mask instead of the size here?
We don't want to change API now.
Nikita
Powered by blists - more mailing lists